Its only job in this process is to host the WinINSTALL software. The ‘Host’ machine can be the machine you use every day. msi, and then on all the machines this software is installed on. You want the bare minimum on this ‘Setup’ machine because you don’t want anything going on in the background that would end up in your capture, your. I recommend capturing an image of the ‘Setup’ machine at this point so you can quickly restore it to this point for conveniently capturing MSI files in the future. You are going to install Windows, the network driver, and possibly the video card drivers. The ‘Setup’ machine ( this is important) is going to be a fresh install of Windows. The ‘Host’ machine can be any machine on the network that the ‘Setup’ machine can reach and access its shares. I’ll just use these names to keep them straight. The 2 computers are going to consist of a ‘Setup’ machine and a ‘Host’ machine. The latest Mozilla Firefox 3 setup file. WinINSTALL LE 2003 (mentioned in the Making Setup.exe into Setup.msi post.).I assume if you’re still reading, you’re already interested in creating one. I don’t mean to rag on FrontMotion too much, that’s not the point of this, but I want individuals to choose wisely and not waste their time with the current offerings of that site. This will come later.Įnough complaining and justifying making our own MSI for Firefox. If we make our own MSI, we do not have to worry about this and perhaps with advanced configuration we can set our own settings and extensions to default for our users. It was just an empty text file this time, but it still proves that this has to be a trusted relationship. They had different created and modified dates because the software was deployed when the machines restarted and they all restart at different times and frequencies. After deploying FF3, I noticed these test.txt files showing up on all of the machines. msi includes a suspicious, random, and unrequested file: C:test.txt. Case in point, FrontMotion’s Firefox 3.0. On a side note, the delay between Mozilla releasing Firefox 3.0.exe and FrontMotion releasing Firefox 3.0.msi was several weeks.Īlong with the aforementioned downsides, we would also be subject to any additional files, settings, and extensions included in the MSI installation. This also makes me depending on FrontMotion for future releases of the MSI and their schedule. This means I would have to deploy Firefox every time there was an update released from Mozilla instead of just deploying it the one time in order to stay up to date with security patches. The setting was locked so I couldn’t change it, even as a local administrator. In fact, the Firefox I had deployed was not only configured to disable automatic updating. I later found out that this was a poor idea when Firefox 3.0.1 was released by Mozilla and my machines were no longer updating automatically. MSI file instead.) I used the MSI file FrontMotion provided to deploy Firefox 3.0 throughout my organization. I highly recommend you follow this post and create your own. One of the most popular ones is using FrontMotion’s Firefox MSI. Instead, system administrators are left relying upon third party solutions to post. Update: This capturing method of installing Firefox 3 is still valid, but there is a better alternative here: Windows Installer Wrapper Wizard and a Better Firefox 3 Enterprise Deployment It seems to me that this would be a great direction for Mozilla to push for as it would make the Enterprise market share much more plausible and reachable audience. MSI file for easy deployment and management. I posted the various products I had found earlier with the post Making Setup.exe into Setup.msi. A popular and convenient way of deploying software is to use Microsoft’s Group Policy to assign packages (.msi files).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |